universal law

Month

June 2012

14 posts

“It is interesting that gravitas and parenthood don’t seem to go together.” —Anne-Marie Slaughter, from her exceptional piece, “Why Women Can’t Have It All” (The Atlantic)
Jun 25, 2012
“The cultural fixation on the couple blinds us to the full web of relationships that sustain us on a daily basis. We are far more than whom we are (or aren’t) married to: we are also friends, grandparents, colleagues, cousins, and so on. To ignore the depth and complexities of these networks is to limit the full range of our emotional experiences.” — Kate Bolick, from “All the Single Ladies,” (The Atlantic)
Jun 25, 2012
The magic of being young and single...

Isn’t about casual sex as much as unrestricted freedom and discovery. It’s like lurching into motion on a new roller coaster, where you can get a certain breathless thrill simply from having no control over what lies ahead. Being completely untethered, with only your personal instincts to answer to, is life’s big blank slate.

And without creating any illusions that I’m unsatisfied with my complex and fantastic new (young, partnered) state, I find great fondness in memories of my young, single phase— just like rolling down the windows during a solo drive down an endless stretch of desert highway. 

Back when I believed my mother had a happy marriage—and she did for quite a long time, really—she surprised me by confiding that one of the most blissful moments of her life had been when she was 21, driving down the highway in her VW Beetle, with nowhere to go except wherever she wanted to be. “I had my own car, my own job, all the clothes I wanted,” she remembered wistfully. Why couldn’t she have had more of that?

(“All the Single Ladies,” by Kate Bolick - via The Atlantic)

Jun 25, 2012
Jun 18, 20121,243 notes
I will never again download music illegally. → thetrichordist.wordpress.com

Sounds like a Bart Simpson detention mantra— but actually just a long-overdue pragmatic conversion. I realize there’s simply no way for me to defend not paying for new music: I should, and I can. 

Hats off to you, David Lowery. Someone’s gotta call out this technologically-enabled hypocrisy.

(via the Trichordist)

Jun 18, 2012
Jun 13, 20121,266 notes
Play
Jun 13, 2012897 notes
Jun 9, 20121 note
What the WI recall really tells us about the future of American politics:

Two things are happening simultaneously among the key interest groups in American politics. Labor is getting weaker. And corporations, in part due to Citizens United, are getting much stronger. The electoral effect of that is obvious: It favors Republicans. But the legislative effect is, perhaps, more significant: It favors corporate interests in Congress, as Democrats will have to be that much more solicitous of business demands in order to keep from being spent into oblivion.

For a long time, a lot of the energy has been devoted to the question of “how do you revive the labor movement?” The truth is, at this point, you probably can’t. You can slow decline. And you can score isolated wins. But it’s hard to see a real turnaround in labor’s fortunes.

But if you take labor’s decline as a given, then another question presents itself: How do you limit the resulting corporate power over elections and legislators? And that’s much more possible, even in a post-Citizens United world. There’s legislation, like the Fair Elections Now Act, that could publicly finance elections. There’s legislation, like the DISCLOSE Act, that could force so much transparency on corporate spending that it ceases to be an attractive option.

Republicans have had great success arguing that organized labor has too much political power. So much success, in fact, that it seems clear that labor will soon have too little. But last night showed that Democrats aren’t going to get very far simply disputing Republican claims on this point. Rather, they should argue that all interest groups have too much political power, and unite behind legislation that would weaken them.

(Ezra Klein, via Wonkbook)

Jun 7, 2012
Jun 5, 201246,088 notes
Jun 5, 2012684 notes
LOL colonialist jokes

colony-of-slippermen:

ladies, you know what they always say: “once you go white, you regret it for the next 300 years of imperialist exploitation and unchanging systemic inequality”

Jun 5, 2012664 notes
Unhappy Republican Surprise of the Week: morning-after pills aren't the devil. → nytimes.com

Studies have not established that emergency contraceptive pills prevent fertilized eggs from implanting in the womb, leading scientists say. Rather, the pills delay ovulation, the release of eggs from ovaries that occurs before eggs are fertilized, and some pills also thicken cervical mucus so sperm have trouble swimming.

It turns out that the politically charged debate over morning-after pills and abortion, a divisive issue in this election year, is probably rooted in outdated or incorrect scientific guesses about how the pills work. Because they block creation of fertilized eggs, they would not meet abortion opponents’ definition of abortion-inducing drugs.

(Kudos to this bold reporting effort from NYT!)

Jun 5, 20121 note
Jun 4, 2012

May 2012

9 posts

“Every time you see a naked woman’s body on screen, it’s either in a sexual context — or if it’s an older woman it’s the scene in ‘About Schmidt,’ where Kathy Bates gets in to the hot tub and the whole audience is supposed to scream, and Jack Nicholson is so horrified. I’ve seen that over and over, and I find that really offensive that women’s bodies are either objectified or used for comic value.” —

Director Sarah Polley, on female nudity in Hollywood

(via this interesting piece in NYT)

May 31, 2012
Next page →
2012 2013
  • January
  • February 3
  • March 2
  • April
  • May 3
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
2011 2012 2013
  • January 1
  • February 22
  • March 44
  • April 17
  • May 9
  • June 14
  • July 16
  • August 2
  • September 3
  • October 6
  • November
  • December
2010 2011 2012
  • January 32
  • February 13
  • March 17
  • April 8
  • May 6
  • June 24
  • July 12
  • August
  • September 2
  • October 2
  • November 3
  • December 5
2009 2010 2011
  • January 45
  • February 109
  • March 91
  • April 47
  • May 76
  • June 53
  • July 39
  • August 4
  • September 47
  • October 30
  • November 23
  • December 31
2009 2010
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June 170
  • July 198
  • August 64
  • September 21
  • October 70
  • November 125
  • December 48